Understanding the AI Threat Landscape
AI systems face unique attack vectors that traditional security measures cannot address.
Prompt Injection
Malicious inputs designed to override AI instructions, extract training data, or cause unintended actions. The #1 threat to LLM applications.
CRITICALData Poisoning
Corrupting training data to introduce backdoors or bias into models. Can occur during initial training or continuous learning.
HIGHModel Extraction
Attackers query your API to reverse-engineer proprietary models, stealing your IP and competitive advantage.
HIGHModel Inversion
Extracting sensitive training data from model outputs. Can expose PII, trade secrets, or confidential information.
HIGHAdversarial Examples
Carefully crafted inputs that cause misclassification. Critical for safety systems, fraud detection, and autonomous vehicles.
MEDIUMModel Drift & Decay
Performance degradation over time as data distributions change. Can lead to biased or incorrect decisions without monitoring.
MEDIUMThe Attack Surface is Expanding
Every component of your AI stack presents potential vulnerabilities:
- Data layer: Training data, feature stores, data pipelines
- Model layer: Model weights, architecture, hyperparameters
- Infrastructure layer: GPUs, cloud services, containers
- Application layer: APIs, user interfaces, integrations
- Human layer: Data scientists, ML engineers, business users
AI Governance Frameworks
Establishing policies and processes for responsible AI deployment.
NIST AI RMF
The US National Institute of Standards framework for managing AI risks. Covers governance, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks.
EU AI Act
The world's first comprehensive AI law. Risk-based approach with strict requirements for high-risk AI systems.
ISO/IEC 42001
International standard for AI Management Systems. Provides certification path for organizations deploying AI.
Singapore AI Governance
Model AI Governance Framework from IMDA. Practical guidance for organizations in APAC deploying AI.
Building Your AI Governance Structure
Effective AI governance requires clear roles and responsibilities:
- AI Ethics Board: Cross-functional team overseeing AI strategy and ethical considerations
- AI Security Officer: Dedicated role for AI-specific security concerns
- Model Risk Management: Ongoing assessment and monitoring of AI risks
- Data Governance: Policies for training data quality, privacy, and lineage
- Incident Response: AI-specific playbooks for security incidents
Securing Large Language Models
Special considerations for generative AI and LLM deployments.
The OWASP Top 10 for LLMs
The Open Web Application Security Project has identified the top security risks for LLM applications:
- LLM01: Prompt Injection - Crafted inputs that hijack model behavior
- LLM02: Insecure Output Handling - Trusting LLM outputs without validation
- LLM03: Training Data Poisoning - Corrupted data affecting model behavior
- LLM04: Model Denial of Service - Resource exhaustion attacks
- LLM05: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities - Compromised models or dependencies
- LLM06: Sensitive Information Disclosure - Leaking training data or PII
- LLM07: Insecure Plugin Design - Vulnerable integrations and tools
- LLM08: Excessive Agency - Too much autonomy without guardrails
- LLM09: Overreliance - Trusting AI without human oversight
- LLM10: Model Theft - Extracting proprietary model capabilities
🛡️ LLM Security Controls
Security in the ML Pipeline
Integrating security throughout the machine learning lifecycle.
| Pipeline Stage | Security Measures | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Data Collection | Data validation, PII detection, consent management | Great Expectations, Presidio |
| Data Storage | Encryption at rest, access controls, audit logging | AWS S3 + KMS, Azure Blob + Key Vault |
| Training | Secure compute, differential privacy, federated learning | TensorFlow Privacy, PySyft |
| Model Registry | Model signing, versioning, vulnerability scanning | MLflow, Weights & Biases |
| Deployment | Container security, secrets management, network isolation | Trivy, HashiCorp Vault, Istio |
| Monitoring | Drift detection, anomaly detection, bias monitoring | Evidently AI, Fiddler, Arthur |
Navigating AI Regulations
Understanding the evolving landscape of AI-specific laws and requirements.
| Regulation | Scope | Key Requirements | Penalties |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | All AI systems in EU market | Risk classification, conformity assessment, transparency | Up to €35M or 7% revenue |
| US Executive Order on AI | Federal agencies, critical infrastructure | Safety testing, red teaming, watermarking | Varies by sector |
| Singapore PDPA + AI | AI processing personal data | Consent, purpose limitation, data protection | Up to S$1M |
| Vietnam Cybersecurity Law | AI with Vietnamese user data | Data localization, security assessments | Varies |
AI Security Implementation Checklist
A practical checklist for securing your AI deployments.
